高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

海洋沉积物中自生黄铁矿研究的体视镜挑选与铬还原处理方法对比——来自南海北部陆坡Site 4B站位的研究

林杞 王家生 卜庆涛 李超 林荣骁 孙飞 张卫坤

林杞, 王家生, 卜庆涛, 李超, 林荣骁, 孙飞, 张卫坤. 海洋沉积物中自生黄铁矿研究的体视镜挑选与铬还原处理方法对比——来自南海北部陆坡Site 4B站位的研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(6): 1052-1059.
引用本文: 林杞, 王家生, 卜庆涛, 李超, 林荣骁, 孙飞, 张卫坤. 海洋沉积物中自生黄铁矿研究的体视镜挑选与铬还原处理方法对比——来自南海北部陆坡Site 4B站位的研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(6): 1052-1059.
Lin Qi, Wang Jia-sheng, Bu Qing-tao, Li Chao, Lin Rong-xiao, Sun Fei, Zhang Wei-kun. Method Comparison of Authigenic Pyrite Analysis between the Handpicking under Binocular Microscope and the CRS in Shallow Cored Marine Sediments: An example from the Site 4B, northern continental slope of the South China Sea[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(6): 1052-1059.
Citation: Lin Qi, Wang Jia-sheng, Bu Qing-tao, Li Chao, Lin Rong-xiao, Sun Fei, Zhang Wei-kun. Method Comparison of Authigenic Pyrite Analysis between the Handpicking under Binocular Microscope and the CRS in Shallow Cored Marine Sediments: An example from the Site 4B, northern continental slope of the South China Sea[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(6): 1052-1059.

海洋沉积物中自生黄铁矿研究的体视镜挑选与铬还原处理方法对比——来自南海北部陆坡Site 4B站位的研究

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973,2011CB808805,2009CB219506)、国家自然科学基金(批准号:41172102,41472085)、南海天然气水合物成矿理论及分布预测研究子课题(编号:GZH20110030-50603,-6WX02)与东华理工大学核资源与环境教育部重点实验室联合资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    林杞 男 1987年出生 博士研究生 海洋天然气水合物沉积学和矿物学 E-mail: yiyanglinqi@126.com

    通讯作者:

    王家生 男 博士生导师 E-mail: js-wang@cug.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: P736.2

Method Comparison of Authigenic Pyrite Analysis between the Handpicking under Binocular Microscope and the CRS in Shallow Cored Marine Sediments: An example from the Site 4B, northern continental slope of the South China Sea

  • 摘要: 黄铁矿是大陆边缘海相沉积物中常见的自生矿物类型之一,对沉积环境变化、早期成岩作用和天然气水合物均有重要的指示意义.体视镜挑选和铬还原处理两种方法是目前研究海相沉积物中自生黄铁矿的最常用方法,但少有对这二种方法进行对比研究的报道.本文采用上述二种方法对取自南海北部陆坡神狐海域Site 4B站位的浅表层沉积物中的黄铁矿进行了测试与分析,结果表明二种方法获得的黄铁矿相对含量及其硫同位素值的主要变化特征均有良好的同步性,且二种方法结果的差值基本保持在一定的误差范围内,说明任何一种方法都可以有效地反映沉积物中黄铁矿相对含量及其硫同位素值的主要变化规律.然而,上述二种方法从操作性和经济实用性上存在较明显的差别,铬还原处理方法从理论上更为科学和准确,但是体视镜挑选方法具有明显的易操作、经济性和实用性.本文研究后建议在实际应用过程中不妨将两种方法结合,即初期样品处理采用体视镜挑选方法,获得整个沉积物中黄铁矿产出变化规律,后期对变化明显区段采用铬还原处理方法进行更精确研究.
  • [1] Jørgensen B B. Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed-the role of sulphate reduction [J]. Nature, 1982, 296: 643-645
    [2] Niewöhner C, Hensen C, Kasten S,et al. Deep sulfate reduction completely mediated by anaerobic methane oxidation in sediments of the upwelling area off Namibia [J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1998, 62(3): 455-464
    [3] Hinrichs K U, Hayes J M, Sylva S P,et al. Methane-consuming archaebacteria in marine sediments [J]. Nature, 1999, 398(6730): 802-805
    [4] Sloan E D. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gas[M]. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1998: 1-10
    [5] Kvenvolden K A. Gas hydrates-geological perspective and global change [J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1993, 31 (2): 173-187
    [6] Kvenvolden K A. Methane hydrate in the global organic carbon cycle [J]. Terra Nova, 2002, 14(5): 302-306
    [7] Boetius A, Ravenschlag K, Schubert C J, et al. A marine microbial consortium apparently mediating anaerobic oxidation of methane [J]. Nature, 2000, 407: 577-579
    [8] Jørgensen B B, Böttcher M E, Lüschen H,et al. Anaerobic methane oxidation and a deep H2S sink generate isotopically heavy sulfides in Black Sea sediments [J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2004, 68(9): 2095-2118
    [9] Chen Duofu, Feng Dong, Su Zheng, et al. Pyrite crystallization in seep carbonates at gas vent and hydrate site [J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 2006, 26: 602-605
    [10] Pu Xiaoqiang, Zhong Shaojun, Yu Wenquan, et al. Authigenic sulfide minerals and their sulfur isotopes in sediments of the northern continental slope of the South China Sea and their implications for methane flux and gas hydrate formation [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(3): 401-401
    [11] 陈祈,王家生,魏清,等. 综合大洋钻探计划311航次沉积物中自生黄铁矿及其硫稳定同位素研究[J]. 现代地质,2008,22(3):402-406 [Chen Qi, Wang Jiasheng, Wei Qing, et al. Study on the authigenic pyrites and their sulfur stable isotopes in recovered sediments during IODP 311 Expedition [J]. Geoscience, 2008, 22(3): 402-406]
    [12] Feng Dong. Chen Duofu, Roberts H H. Petrographic and geochemical characterization of seep carbonate from Bush Hill (GC185) gas vent and hydrate site of the Gulf of Mexico [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2009, 26(7): 1190-1198
    [13] Lim Y C, Lin S, Yang T F,et al. Variations of methane induced pyrite formation in the accretionary wedge sediments offshore southwestern Taiwan [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2011, 28(10): 1829-1837
    [14] Peketi A A, Mazumdar R K, Joshi D J,et al. Tracing the Paleo sulfate-methane transition zones and H2S seepage events in marinesediments: An application of C-S-Mo systematics [J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2012, 13(10): doi: 10.1029/2012GC004288
    [15] Borowski W S, Rodriguez N M, Paull C K,et al. Are 34S-enriched authigenic sulfide minerals a proxy for elevated methane flux and gas hydrates in the geologic record [J]? Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, 43: 381-395
    [16] 陈忠,颜文,陈木宏,等. 南沙海槽表层沉积自生石膏—黄铁矿组合的成因及其对天然气渗漏的指示意义[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2007,27(2):91-100 [Chen Zhong, Yan Wen, Chen Muhong, et al. Formation of authigenic gypsum and pyrite assenblage and its significance to gas ventings in Nansha Trough, South China Sea [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2007, 27(2): 91-100]
    [17] 陆红锋,廖志良,陈芳,等. 南海神狐海域天然气水合物钻孔自生黄铁矿特征[J]. 南海地质研究,2010, 1: 1-6 [Lu Hongfeng, Liao Zhiliang, Chen Fang, et al. Authigenic pyrite in the sediments of gas-hydrate drilliing sites, Shenhu area, South China Sea [J]. Gresearch of Eological South China Sea, 2010, 1: 1-6]
    [18] 张美,孙晓明,徐莉,等. 南海台西南盆地自生管状黄铁矿中纳米级石磨炭的发现及其对天然气水合物的示踪意义[J]. 科学通报,2011,56(21):1756-1762 [Zhang Mei, Sun Xiaoming, Xu Li, et al. Nano-sized graphitic carbon in authigenic tube pyrites from offshore southwest Taiwan, South China Sea, and its implication for tracing gas hydrate [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(21): 1756-1762]
    [19] Canfield D E, Raiswell R, Westrich J T,et al. The use of chromium reduction in the analysis of reduced inorganic sulfur in sediments and shales [J]. Chemical Geology, 1986, 54(1/2): 149-155
    [20] Zhu Weilin, Zhong Kai, Li Youchuan, et al. Characteristics of hydrocarbon accumulation and exploration potential of the northern South China Sea deepwater basins [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2012, 57(24): 3121-3129
    [21] 宋海斌, 耿建华, Wang H K. 南海北部东沙海域天然气水合物的初步研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2001,44(5):687-695 [Song Haibin, Geng Jianhua, Wang H K. A preliminary study of gas hydrates in Dongsha region north of South China Sea [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2001, 44(5): 687-695]
    [22] Yang Tao, Jiang Shaoyong, Ge Lu, et al. Geochemical characteristics of pore water in shallow sediments from Shenhu area of South China Sea and their significance for gas hydrate occurrence [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(8): 752-760
    [23] Wu Lushan, Yang Shengxiong, Liang Jinqiang, et al. Variations of pore water sulfate gradients in sediments as indicator for underlying gas hydrate in Shenhu Area, the South China Sea [J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2013, 56(4): 530-540
    [24] Zhang Haiqi, Yang Shengxiong, Wu Nengyou, et al. China's first gas hydrate expedition successful [C]//Fire in the Ice: Methane Hydrate Newsletter, National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S Department of Energy, Spring/Summer issue 1, 2007
    [25] 谢蕾. 南海北部神狐—东沙海域浅表层沉积物中自生黄铁矿及其水合物指示意义[D]. 湖北:中国地质大学(武汉),2012:17[Xie Lei. Characteristics of authigenic pyrites within shallow sediments at Shenhu-Dongsha area in northern South China Sea and implication for gas hydrate [D]. Hubei: China Uniersitiy of Geosiciences(Wuhan), 2012: 17]
    [26] Xie Lei, Wang Jiasheng, Wu Nengyou, et al. Characteristics of authigenic pyrites in shallow core sediments in the Shenhu area of the northern South China Sea: Implications for a possible mud volcano environment [J]. Science China: Earth Science, 2013, 56(4): 541-548
    [27] Hsieh Y P, Yang C H. Diffusion methods for the determination of reduced inorganic sulfer species in sediments [J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 1989, 34: 1126-1130
    [28] Hsieh Y P, Shieh Y N. Analysis of reduced inorganic sulfur by diffusion methods: improved apparatus and evaluation for sulfur isotopic studies [J]. Chemical Geology, 1997, 137(3/4): 255-261
    [29] Lord C J III. A selective and precise method for pyrite determination in sedimentary materials [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1982, 52(2): 664-666
    [30] 王昆山,石学法,李珍,等. 东海DGKS9617岩心重矿物及自生黄铁矿记录[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2005,25(4):41-45 [Wang Kunshan, Shi Xuefa, Li Zhen, et al. Records of heavy mineral and authigenous pyrite in Core DGKS9617 from the East China Sea [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2005, 25(4): 41-45]
    [31] 刘坚,陆红锋,廖志良,等. 东沙海洋浅层沉积物硫化物分布特征与天然气水合物的关系[J]. 地学前缘,2005,12(3):258-262 [Liu Jian, Lu Hongfeng, Liao Zhiliang, et al. Distribution in sulfides in shallow sediments in Dongsha area, South China Sea, and its relationship to gas hydrate[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005, 12(3): 258-262]
    [32] Sassen R, Roberts H H, Camey R,et al. Free hydrocarbon gas, gas hydrate, and authigenic minerals in chemosynthetic communities of the northern Gulf of Mexico continental slope: ralation to microbial processes [J]. Chemical Geology, 2004, 205(3/4): 195-217
    [33] 王晓芹,王家生,魏清,等. 综合大洋钻探计划311航次沉积物中自生碳酸盐岩碳、氧稳定同位素特征[J]. 现代地质,2008,22(3):397-401 [Wang Xiaoqin, Wang Jiasheng, Wei Qing, et al. Stable carbon and oxygen isotopes characteristics of the authigenic carbonate in recovered sediments during IODP 311 Expedition [J]. Geoscience, 2008, 22(3): 397-401]
    [34] Li Qing, Wang Jiasheng, Chen Jianwen, et al. Stable carbon isotopes of benthic foraminifers from IODP Expedition 311 as possible indicators of episodic methane seep events in a gas hydrate geosystem [J]. Palaios, 2010, 25(10): 671-681
  • [1] 李文, 穆桂金, 林永崇, 张慧娟, 吴汪洋, 孙蕗.  罗布泊自生胶黄铁矿对磁性参数χARM/SIRM指示意义的影响 . 沉积学报, 2022, 40(5): 1280-1288. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.008
    [2] 刘喜停, 李安春, 马志鑫, 董江, 张凯棣, 徐方建, 王厚杰.  沉积过程对自生黄铁矿硫同位素的约束 . 沉积学报, 2020, 38(1): 124-137. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2019.073
    [3] 邱红, 邹立, 张民生, 朱超祁, 贾永刚.  南海北部油气缓释环境沉积物脂类化合物组成特征 . 沉积学报, 2019, 37(2): 416-423. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.137
    [4] 王竣雅, 邬黛黛, 陈雪刚.  南海神狐海域Site 4B沉积物地球化学特征及其对甲烷渗漏的指示意义 . 沉积学报, 2019, 37(3): 648-660. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.144
    [5] 林荣骁, 王家生, 苏丕波, 林杞, 孙飞, 杨军霞.  南海东北部岩芯沉积物磁性特征及对甲烷事件的指示 . 沉积学报, 2017, 35(2): 290-298. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2017.02.008
    [6] 史春潇, 雷怀彦, 赵晶, 张劼, 韩超.  南海北部九龙甲烷礁邻区沉积物层中垂向细菌群落结构特征研究 . 沉积学报, 2014, 32(6): 1072-1082.
    [7] 南海北部深水区沉积物稀土元素特征及其物源指示意义 . 沉积学报, 2012, 30(4): 672-678.
    [8] 南海北部神狐陆坡限制型滑塌体特征及成因机理 . 沉积学报, 2012, 30(4): 639-645.
    [9] 袁圣强.  南海北部陆坡深水曲流水道的识别及成因 . 沉积学报, 2010, 28(1): 68-75.
    [10] 吴时国.  南海北部陆坡深水沉积体系研究 . 沉积学报, 2009, 27(5): 922-930.
    [11] 王海荣.  南海东北部台湾浅滩陆坡的浊流沉积物波的发育及其成因的构造控制 . 沉积学报, 2008, 26(1): 39-45.
    [12] 王宏斌.  南海北部陆坡构造坡折带中的天然气水合物 . 沉积学报, 2008, 26(2): 283-293.
    [13] 南海北部陆坡古地貌特征与13.8Ma以来珠江深水扇 . 沉积学报, 2006, 24(4): 476-482.
    [14] 冯 东.  新元古代晚期盖帽碳酸盐岩的成因与“雪球地球”的终结机制 . 沉积学报, 2006, 24(2): 235-241.
    [15] 陈多福, 冯东, 陈光谦, 陈先沛, Lawrence M Cathles.  海底天然气渗漏系统演化特征及对形成水合物的影响 . 沉积学报, 2005, 23(2): 323-328.
    [16] 孟宪伟, 刘保华, 石学法, 吴金龙.  冲绳海槽中段西陆坡下缘天然气水合物存在的可能性分析 . 沉积学报, 2000, 18(4): 629-633.
    [17] 雷怀彦, 王先彬, 房玄, 郑艳红.  天然气水合物研究现状与未来挑战 . 沉积学报, 1999, 17(3): 493-498.
    [18] 雷怀彦, 王先彬, 郑艳红, 张中宁, 周晓峰.  天然气水合物地质前景 . 沉积学报, 1999, 17(S1): 846-853.
    [19] 王益友, 张国栋, 朱静昌, 周福根.  长江口及其邻近陆架区沉积物的早期成岩作用 . 沉积学报, 1991, 9(1): 54-62.
    [20] 贾炳文, 郝临山.  大同云岗矿区井下陷落柱中的地开石 . 沉积学报, 1987, 5(1): 77-85.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  950
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  684
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-12-18
  • 修回日期:  2014-03-06
  • 刊出日期:  2014-12-10

目录

    海洋沉积物中自生黄铁矿研究的体视镜挑选与铬还原处理方法对比——来自南海北部陆坡Site 4B站位的研究

      基金项目:  国家重点基础研究发展计划(973,2011CB808805,2009CB219506)、国家自然科学基金(批准号:41172102,41472085)、南海天然气水合物成矿理论及分布预测研究子课题(编号:GZH20110030-50603,-6WX02)与东华理工大学核资源与环境教育部重点实验室联合资助
      作者简介:

      林杞 男 1987年出生 博士研究生 海洋天然气水合物沉积学和矿物学 E-mail: yiyanglinqi@126.com

      通讯作者: 王家生 男 博士生导师 E-mail: js-wang@cug.edu.cn
    • 中图分类号: P736.2

    摘要: 黄铁矿是大陆边缘海相沉积物中常见的自生矿物类型之一,对沉积环境变化、早期成岩作用和天然气水合物均有重要的指示意义.体视镜挑选和铬还原处理两种方法是目前研究海相沉积物中自生黄铁矿的最常用方法,但少有对这二种方法进行对比研究的报道.本文采用上述二种方法对取自南海北部陆坡神狐海域Site 4B站位的浅表层沉积物中的黄铁矿进行了测试与分析,结果表明二种方法获得的黄铁矿相对含量及其硫同位素值的主要变化特征均有良好的同步性,且二种方法结果的差值基本保持在一定的误差范围内,说明任何一种方法都可以有效地反映沉积物中黄铁矿相对含量及其硫同位素值的主要变化规律.然而,上述二种方法从操作性和经济实用性上存在较明显的差别,铬还原处理方法从理论上更为科学和准确,但是体视镜挑选方法具有明显的易操作、经济性和实用性.本文研究后建议在实际应用过程中不妨将两种方法结合,即初期样品处理采用体视镜挑选方法,获得整个沉积物中黄铁矿产出变化规律,后期对变化明显区段采用铬还原处理方法进行更精确研究.

    English Abstract

    林杞, 王家生, 卜庆涛, 李超, 林荣骁, 孙飞, 张卫坤. 海洋沉积物中自生黄铁矿研究的体视镜挑选与铬还原处理方法对比——来自南海北部陆坡Site 4B站位的研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(6): 1052-1059.
    引用本文: 林杞, 王家生, 卜庆涛, 李超, 林荣骁, 孙飞, 张卫坤. 海洋沉积物中自生黄铁矿研究的体视镜挑选与铬还原处理方法对比——来自南海北部陆坡Site 4B站位的研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(6): 1052-1059.
    Lin Qi, Wang Jia-sheng, Bu Qing-tao, Li Chao, Lin Rong-xiao, Sun Fei, Zhang Wei-kun. Method Comparison of Authigenic Pyrite Analysis between the Handpicking under Binocular Microscope and the CRS in Shallow Cored Marine Sediments: An example from the Site 4B, northern continental slope of the South China Sea[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(6): 1052-1059.
    Citation: Lin Qi, Wang Jia-sheng, Bu Qing-tao, Li Chao, Lin Rong-xiao, Sun Fei, Zhang Wei-kun. Method Comparison of Authigenic Pyrite Analysis between the Handpicking under Binocular Microscope and the CRS in Shallow Cored Marine Sediments: An example from the Site 4B, northern continental slope of the South China Sea[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(6): 1052-1059.
    参考文献 (34)

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回