Advanced Search

LAI Sheng-hua, SUN Lai-xi, ZHAO Xia-fei. The Architecture and Distribution of the Upper Triassic Reservoir of the Northern Chuxiong Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2005, 23(2): 232-239.
Citation: LAI Sheng-hua, SUN Lai-xi, ZHAO Xia-fei. The Architecture and Distribution of the Upper Triassic Reservoir of the Northern Chuxiong Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2005, 23(2): 232-239.

The Architecture and Distribution of the Upper Triassic Reservoir of the Northern Chuxiong Basin

  • Received Date: 2004-02-17
  • Rev Recd Date: 2004-09-08
  • Publish Date: 2005-06-10
  • The Triassic reservoir sandstone was from the basin-floor fan to the coastal bar and the delta, and can be divided into eight third-order sequences in the Chuxiong basin during late Triassic. This paper, using depositional sequence stratigraphy and high-resolution sequence stratigraphy, using extended Simpon math, extended Simpon 3 /8 math and Trapezoidalmath, has studied the reservoir architecture and spatial distribution through measured sections.The reservoir-body of upper Triassic, showing successive thin from lower to upper, was sandstone and conglomerate.The southern and northern fan-bodies of the Pujiacun formation ( T3 p) thatwas 7162 km3 had not become connection.Although the northern sandstone and conglomerate hasworse connection, shorter extension and more extensive heterogeneity, the southern channel sandstone bodies have been larger and better connection. The sandstone and conglomerate of the Ganhaizi formation ( T3 s), which was 4175 km3, was oval distribution, more barrier layers and extensive heterogeneity in the north, and was circling distribution, weaker maro-heterogeneity in the south. The circling sand-stone body of the Shezi Formation ( T3 s) was 5036 km3, in which the connection of the lake sandstone bodywasworse than that of the channel sandstone body and the latterwas been characterized by more homogeneous
  • [1] 1 许效松. 楚雄盆地沉积层序演化[J].岩相古地理,1999,(05):1-11.

    2 陈根文. 楚雄弧后前陆盆地的形成与演化[J].云南地质,1999,(04):392-397.

    3 谭富文,尹福光,许效松. 楚雄前陆盆地系统的构造单元及沉积标识[J].沉积学报,2000,(04):573-579.

    4 Cao Debin. Characteristics of Triassic in Yunanjiang and its stratigraphic correlation[J].Yunnan Geology,2001,(04):392-400.

    5 Robinson J W,McGbe P J. Sandstone-body and shale-body dimensions in a braided fluvial system: Salt Wash Sandstone member (Morrison formation), Garfield county,Utah[J].AAPG Bulletin,1997,(08):1267-1291.

    6 Reynolds A D. Dimensions of Paralic Sandstone bodies[J].AAPG Bulletin,1999,(02):211-229.

    7 Jordan T E,andFlemmings P B. Large-scale stratigraphic architecture, eustatic variation, and unsteady tectonism: a theoretical evaluation[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1991,(B4):6681-6699.

    8 Thorne J A,Swift D J P.Sedimenttation on continental margins, VI: a regime model for depositional sequences, their component systems tracts, and bounding surfaces[A].International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication,1991.189-255.

    9 Posamentier H W,Allen G P,James D P. Forced regressions in a sequence stratigraphy : concepts, examples and exploration significance[J].AAPG BULLETIN,1992,(10):1687-1709.

    10 Heller P L,Paola C. Geomorphology and sequence stratigraphy due to slow and rapid base-level changes in an experimental subsiding basin(XES96-1)[J].AAPG Bulletin,2001,(05):817-838.

    11 Scott R M,Tillman R W. Society of Economy Paleontologic Mineralogy[J].Core workshop,1981.

    12 Kaufman P,Grotzinger J P,Mcormick D S. Depth-dependent diffusion algorithm for simulation in shallow marine depositional systems[A].Kansas Geological Survey,1991.489-508.

    13 Paola C,Heller P L,Angevine C L. The large-scale dynamics of grain-size variation in alluvial basins, I: Theory[J].Basin Research,1992,(02):73-90.

    14 Rivenaes J C.Application of a dual-lithology, depth-dependent diffusion equation in stratigraphic simulation[J].Basin Research,1992,(02):133-146.

    15 张金亮,常象春,刘宝珺. 楚雄盆地上三叠统深盆气成藏条件研究[J].沉积学报,2002,(02):469-476.

    16 李儒峰,金之钧,马永生. 盆地波动特征与生储盖层耦合关系分析--以楚雄盆地为例[J].沉积学报,2004,(03):474-480.

    17 Harris P M,Kerans C,Beboub D G. Ancient outcrop and modern examples of platform carbonate cycles implications for subsurface correlation and understanding reservoir heterogeneity[A]. AAPG Memoir,1994.475-492.

    18 Kerans C,Tinker S W. Use of quantitatively calibrated depositional models in constructing high-resolution sequence strtigraphic frameworks for reservoir characterization (abs)[J].AAPG Annual Convention Program,1994.186.

    19 Mitchum R M,Van Wagoner J C. High-frequency sequence and their stacking patterns: sequence stratigraphic evidence of high-frequency eustatic cycles[J].Sedimentary Geology,1991.131-160.

    20 Vail P R. Seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedures[A].AAPG Studies in Geology,1987.1-10.

    21 Vail P R,Mitchum Jr R M,Thompson III S. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level, part 4: global cycles of relative changes of sea level[A].AAPG Memoir,1997.83-97.

    22 Van Wagoner J C,Posamentier H W,Vail P R,Sarg J F, Loutit T S, Hardenbol J. An overview of the furdamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definitions[A].SEPM Special Publication,1988.139-145.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(530) PDF downloads(611) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related
Publishing history
  • Received:  2004-02-17
  • Revised:  2004-09-08
  • Published:  2005-06-10

The Architecture and Distribution of the Upper Triassic Reservoir of the Northern Chuxiong Basin

Abstract: The Triassic reservoir sandstone was from the basin-floor fan to the coastal bar and the delta, and can be divided into eight third-order sequences in the Chuxiong basin during late Triassic. This paper, using depositional sequence stratigraphy and high-resolution sequence stratigraphy, using extended Simpon math, extended Simpon 3 /8 math and Trapezoidalmath, has studied the reservoir architecture and spatial distribution through measured sections.The reservoir-body of upper Triassic, showing successive thin from lower to upper, was sandstone and conglomerate.The southern and northern fan-bodies of the Pujiacun formation ( T3 p) thatwas 7162 km3 had not become connection.Although the northern sandstone and conglomerate hasworse connection, shorter extension and more extensive heterogeneity, the southern channel sandstone bodies have been larger and better connection. The sandstone and conglomerate of the Ganhaizi formation ( T3 s), which was 4175 km3, was oval distribution, more barrier layers and extensive heterogeneity in the north, and was circling distribution, weaker maro-heterogeneity in the south. The circling sand-stone body of the Shezi Formation ( T3 s) was 5036 km3, in which the connection of the lake sandstone bodywasworse than that of the channel sandstone body and the latterwas been characterized by more homogeneous

LAI Sheng-hua, SUN Lai-xi, ZHAO Xia-fei. The Architecture and Distribution of the Upper Triassic Reservoir of the Northern Chuxiong Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2005, 23(2): 232-239.
Citation: LAI Sheng-hua, SUN Lai-xi, ZHAO Xia-fei. The Architecture and Distribution of the Upper Triassic Reservoir of the Northern Chuxiong Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2005, 23(2): 232-239.
Reference (1)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return