Advanced Search

Min Maozhong, Wang Xiangyun, Shen Baopei, Wen Guangdou, Fan Tao. Isotopic Geochemistry of Metallogeny for the Largest Paleokarst Uranium Deposit in China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1997, 15(1): 118-122.
Citation: Min Maozhong, Wang Xiangyun, Shen Baopei, Wen Guangdou, Fan Tao. Isotopic Geochemistry of Metallogeny for the Largest Paleokarst Uranium Deposit in China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1997, 15(1): 118-122.

Isotopic Geochemistry of Metallogeny for the Largest Paleokarst Uranium Deposit in China

  • Received Date: 1995-03-29
  • Publish Date: 1997-03-10
  • A uranium deposit is the largest paleokarst type U deposit in loth scale and tonnage in China. Thedeposit is formed below a fossil cave and in a faulting}olution breccia system in the Lower Carbonifer-ous limestone. The temperature of mineralizing fluids ranges from 1810℃to 1500 ℃Four U一Pb ages forpitchblende and whole rock ores, 135, 131, 119 and 65 Ma, have been determined, which are obviouslyyounger than those of the wall rocks. Sulfur isotope data show that the δ34 S values of pyrites from theores range from 1.00 ‰to一15. 3‰with a mean value of一6.87‰,closel to those of pyrites fromthe wall rocks(1. 00‰一15.60‰,mean- 7.06‰),suggesting that the wall rocks are the source ofsulfur for mineralization. The five analyzed samples of calcites from the ores have δ13 Cvalues between 0.34‰and-3.19‰(mean一1.50‰).The similarity between the average carbon isotope composition of the ores(一1.50‰)and the wall rocks(0.53‰)is interpreted to result from an isotope exchange between the wall rock and mineralizing fluid. The lead isotope composition of pyrites from the ores andwhole}ock of Lower Carboiferous sugggests that the source of lead and urarnum in the deposit is vari-ous in strata of the ore field.The value of δ18O and δD for mineralizing fluids range from 1.5‰o 7.3‰ and from一30.4‰to一84.9‰,of metamorphic and meteoric waters.respectively, indicating that the mineralizing fluid is a mixed waterThe mineralizing process is clowly related to development historyof regional tectordic movemnets and multi-episode paleokarstification. Thus, it is named as hydrothermalreworked paleokarst type uranium deposit.
  • [1] 1 刘立钧.387地注型古岩溶铀矿床成因探讨.铀矿地质.1985.1(6):1-10.

    2 Shelton K L and Rye D M. Sulfur isotope compositions ofores from mines Cape, Quebec; an example of sulfate-sulfi deisotopic disequilibria in ore-forming fluids with applications to other porphyry-type deposits, Economic Geology, 198 77 1688-1709.

    3 刘裕庆等.德兴斑岩铜(铝)矿田硫同位素地质特征初步研究.中国地质科学院1i).床地质研究所所刊(第1号)1982,58-65.

    4 Sheppard S M F. Charackerization and isotopic variations in Ylatnral watersRev Mineralogy, 1986, 16 165- 183

    5 ELSharkawi W A.ELArefM M and Motelib A AManganese deposits in a Carboniferous paleokarst profile, Um Bogma Region,West-central Sinal.Egypt, Mineralum De- posita, 1990, 25 34-43.

    6 Olson RA. Genesis of paleoka rst and s t rat a-b ou nd zinc-leadsulfide deposits in a Proterozoic dolostonet NorthernIsland, Canada, Economic Geology, 1984, 79 1056-1103

    7 W allace A R.The relief canyon gold deposit, Nevadaa mineralized solution breccia Economic Geology, 1989, 84 274-190
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(586) PDF downloads(408) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related
Publishing history
  • Received:  1995-03-29
  • Published:  1997-03-10

Isotopic Geochemistry of Metallogeny for the Largest Paleokarst Uranium Deposit in China

Abstract: A uranium deposit is the largest paleokarst type U deposit in loth scale and tonnage in China. Thedeposit is formed below a fossil cave and in a faulting}olution breccia system in the Lower Carbonifer-ous limestone. The temperature of mineralizing fluids ranges from 1810℃to 1500 ℃Four U一Pb ages forpitchblende and whole rock ores, 135, 131, 119 and 65 Ma, have been determined, which are obviouslyyounger than those of the wall rocks. Sulfur isotope data show that the δ34 S values of pyrites from theores range from 1.00 ‰to一15. 3‰with a mean value of一6.87‰,closel to those of pyrites fromthe wall rocks(1. 00‰一15.60‰,mean- 7.06‰),suggesting that the wall rocks are the source ofsulfur for mineralization. The five analyzed samples of calcites from the ores have δ13 Cvalues between 0.34‰and-3.19‰(mean一1.50‰).The similarity between the average carbon isotope composition of the ores(一1.50‰)and the wall rocks(0.53‰)is interpreted to result from an isotope exchange between the wall rock and mineralizing fluid. The lead isotope composition of pyrites from the ores andwhole}ock of Lower Carboiferous sugggests that the source of lead and urarnum in the deposit is vari-ous in strata of the ore field.The value of δ18O and δD for mineralizing fluids range from 1.5‰o 7.3‰ and from一30.4‰to一84.9‰,of metamorphic and meteoric waters.respectively, indicating that the mineralizing fluid is a mixed waterThe mineralizing process is clowly related to development historyof regional tectordic movemnets and multi-episode paleokarstification. Thus, it is named as hydrothermalreworked paleokarst type uranium deposit.

Min Maozhong, Wang Xiangyun, Shen Baopei, Wen Guangdou, Fan Tao. Isotopic Geochemistry of Metallogeny for the Largest Paleokarst Uranium Deposit in China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1997, 15(1): 118-122.
Citation: Min Maozhong, Wang Xiangyun, Shen Baopei, Wen Guangdou, Fan Tao. Isotopic Geochemistry of Metallogeny for the Largest Paleokarst Uranium Deposit in China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1997, 15(1): 118-122.
Reference (1)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return